Thursday, September 30, 2010

Blog #7: Writing Center Philosophies

Note: I apologize that I didn't finish this in time. Also, I'm probably extremely off track, because I still don't understand what the Boquet is saying (Why jargon, WHY??) and North just sounds so ANGRY in the first one that I'm having a hard time sifting through what's anger and what's actually indicitive of his writing center philosophy.

Boquet
-Definitely has some appreciation for the anti-institutional views of some of the people that she quotes, though she acknowledges the problems with their views.
-Seems to be very interested in writing centers in relation to their parent institutions in general. Political agendas are around here somewhere.
-She is process oriented, as shown by her attitudes towards the “fix-it shop” models used earlier in the history of writing centers.
-Her call for throwing out any scripts and engaging in high risk tutoring styles also suggests an orientation towards thinking of process rather than product.
-Feels that scholarship out of writing centers should be less focused on practicalities and on bigger questions, although what those bigger questions are I cannot tell.

North 1
-Claims that the WC is student-centered, but apparently takes a route of supporting the stance of professors.
-Process oriented
-Believes in the WC as a center for research, and does not like the idea of the WC as remediation.

North 2
-Dials back some of his beliefs.
-Acknowledges that WC staff cannot always be neutral in student-professor conflicts.
-still process oriented
-I don't know what else to say.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Blog #6: The infamously difficult first step towards writing a very difficult essay.

NOTE: Alright, so I tried to answer as many questions as possible, but I had trouble with question 4. Also, most of the facts in the first and second paragraphs are paraphrase/summary of the Gee article "Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective." Also, any of my lurking classmates and/or Dr. Chandler want to help me figure out how to use that statistics site, or even read it without going "Huh? what's "n" mean?" let alone find more information about socio-economic status about the students at Kean. All right, without former adeu, here's our show:

In an academic setting, students are required to write in a way that their professors will perceive as “scholarly.” In many cases, this includes analytical, complex, abstract and distanced arguments and statements. Students are expected, for the most part, to remove the self and emotion from any piece of writing that they submit. Colleges traditionally being the realm of the wealthy (or at least middle class), meaning that academic discourse most closely resembles the language used in an upper-middle or upper class home. This puts students from such backgrounds at a distinct advantage.

According to James Gee, working class students have a disadvantage in the way that they use language to relate to the world. Those that come from working-class backgrounds value the use of concrete, action-based, narrative-style language, and also base arguments on personal experience and feelings more often than factual evidence. This does not mean that they are less literate or cognitively capable then those from upper or middle class backgrounds. Nevertheless, they must train themselves to respond in a way that would be received favorably by an instructor if they intend to succeed.

Kean University has a large majority of students who receive financial aid, which makes it likely that problems associated with this class distinction will be present in the Kean University Writing Center. A problem that these students may face is a difficulty constructing arguments that make use of facts and sources in a beneficial way, as these students have not had sufficient experience with fact-based arguments.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Blog #5: This probably should have been my post last time

Focus (kinda, there’s other stuff here too): Students from working class backgrounds have different expectations on how language is used than their professors, who are accustomed to standard academic English, which is closest to the language used by people from the middle class and above. This means that the Writing Center, which sits somewhere between the professors and the students, sees language issues related to students not knowing what their professor expects out of their writing. This is especially noticeable at Kean University, where many students do come from a working class background.

Sources: James Gee, “Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective”, student demographics on the website given in class

I didn’t get very far, but I was struggling just to come up with a focus, so I see this as a triumph on my part. I’m sorry.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Blog #4: WTH are you talking about???



I take issue with this assignment for two reasons:

1) I still don't understand what I'm supposed to do and I've reread the course blog and the assignment sheet like 20 times.

and

2) This assignment seems unfairly biased against students who have not been at Kean long enough to understand the writing culture. I know this is an upper level course, but I'm a transfer student. I do not know what's going on or what professors expect beyond the like 5 that I've had as teachers.

So, I'm not analyizing anything, and I sincerely doubt that anyone's going to be able to help me figure out what I'm supposed to do for this paper since I legitimately just don't understand it at all. I'm posting pictures of what I TRIED to do. Have fun. Laugh at my stupidity. I'm done and I'll take my 0 on this blog.


Thursday, September 16, 2010

Blog #3: Another Brick in the Wall

Wow, so you’re looking for an examination of the writing culture at Kean. That might actually be very hard for me, since as a transfer student I haven’t had the opportunity to really get into the culture here at Kean. I figure that I’ll list a few experiences that I’ve had that might actually help me. Names have been removed to protect the innocent and the not-so-innocent.

My psychology professor tells me that I cannot use my laptop to take notes in her class because for all she knows I might be on that “myface” thing she’s heard about.

-Besides showing an utter lack of respect for social media, which I believe can truly help people as writers (don’t get me started on using a twitter feed as an exercise in brevity and word choice), I think this shows that the professor doesn’t trust digital media, and may not see it as a valid form of writing.

A professor gave me a paper back with just a grade with no feedback on how I could improve it for a better grade. When I asked him for feedback I was told that I shouldn’t need to ask.

-This shows what professors expect that their students should instinctively know about what academic writing should look like. That might come to be difficult for students like me, who have already acclimated to the writing culture of a different school (and believe me when I say that Brookdale was very different when it came to feedback). Also, I’m still not entirely sure if it was my writing or my ideas that this professor had a problem with, and if it was my ideas it reinforces what we talked about in class about how the ideas of the professors are valued much more than the ideas of the student. The professor “owns” writing, whereas the student is simply borrowing the practice as a way to get judged.

A political science professor told me that I should memorize the six page in-class essay before a test and just copy it straight from that memory.

-That shows that outside of the English department there is a severe lack of knowledge about how, exactly, writing works. Anyone who knows about writing or the way the human brain works to expect someone to memorize an entire essay and copy it back on a test.

One thing that I know for sure is that a lot of students that I’ve met here speak (and write) in a non-standard form of English, and that is not valued here at Kean, or really anywhere. Students end up with the impression that their writing is worthless because it doesn’t sound or look like what their professors expect out of an “academic” paper. When I stop to think about it, I start realizing that it makes me think of Pink Floyd’s “The Wall” (the song, not the whole album) and the images from the film that go along with that song. They had a point about how much school pushes students to conform. This push for conformity in writing still exists at the college level, and it is an ingrained part of the culture here at Kean.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Blog # 2: Frizzy, Dizzy, Busy, Messy... or the Writing Equivalent of that, at least.

My writing process is difficult for me to explain, because it seems unconventional and I have been told over and over again that the way I approach writing, especially academic writing, is a bad habit that I must break myself of. I write for my classes in one frenzied mess the night before it’s due, editing as I go along to try and make the writing more precise while getting my ideas all out on the screen (I rarely write by hand for academic pieces) in one long session. That’s not to say that I don’t put thought into my assignments beforehand. For weeks and sometimes months before there will be diagrams and quotes all over my walls and desk on note cards, scrap paper, the margins of books and once even on the inside of a booklet that came along with a music CD (I still regret destroying the liner notes booklet to my copy of Linkin Park’s Minutes to Midnight). Along with these notes are doodles and other little things that come to mind. My prewriting process is a mixture of all different forms of chaos, but I rarely actually look at it all while I’m writing, the simple act of writing them and looking at them for days and weeks on end is what helps me. For things that need a little more thought, like long research papers, I will write whole paragraphs on note cards and arrange and rearrange them to get a feeling for the order that works best before I’ve finished. I’m also a fact hoarder and a talker. Before the frenzied night of writing I will talk to anyone or anything that will listen to my long winded discussions of topics that nobody but me cares about, or I will complain about things that confuse me, or the assignment itself, until through my complaints an idea for one of my many crazy notes comes to mind. I think that’s where I would benefit from a coach the most when writing an academic piece, because they’d listen to my crazy ideas on a topic and help me evaluate them logically, without subjecting my mother or aunt to another three hour phone conversation on the life of Elizabeth Bathory and her connection to older vampire legends and my theories on how the truth gets twisted.

Creative writing pieces, especially long pieces of prose, get a lot more careful attention and thought in the actual composing and in the revision. I stew over creative stories for weeks, months, years at a time, carefully plotting things out and using that plot as a chapter-by-chapter, scene-by-scene roadmap to the actual writing. After the plotting, I tend to write it as freely as I can while sticking to that map, not worrying about the on-the-nose dialogue or repetition until I’ve got multiple chapters done. This is because I know from experience that if I read back the work before I’ve got a giant chunk done, none of it will get done and the story will remain in my brain, unfinished. I don’t think that I would even allow a writing coach to see my creative pieces until I was ready for a workshop session, or someone to help me read through and fix dialogue, and that wouldn’t happen until the very end, when the piece is at least 90% written. I’m superstitious when it comes to my creative writing, and I’m afraid that if I let someone outside myself look at it before I’ve gotten it mostly written out, their opinions or comments will dry up any creativity I have, so I think that this is the kind of writing I would go to a coach with for revision work.

The one thing that is the same for both creative writing and academic writing is the influence of music on my ability to write. I find it much easier to get words out when I have some kind of music playing in the background. When I’m writing for school, the music is ambient background noise, usually instrumental pieces from movie scores, because I find lyrics distracting when I’m trying to write into a complex subject. My creative writing process almost always starts with creating playlists. Relationships, chapters, situations, or the whole mood of the piece itself inform music choices. When I’m writing for myself, music is inspiration, a catalyst. When I’m writing for school, music is a way to drown out background noise (like roommates) and keeps me focused on the task ahead. No matter what, music is involved, not that that particularly matters to the subject at hand.

I’d probably be a very difficult person for a writing coach to handle during the manic periods of idea generation before I actually begin writing for class assignments, because they’d have to follow my stream of consciousness babbling about a subject and try to interject with appropriate observations when I’m jumping from idea to idea at warp factor 9, but that’s probably when I would benefit most from a writing center session. When I’m working on creative pieces, I’d probably bring a fully written project for opinions or an idea of what the coach finds enjoyable rather than coming to them earlier on in my process, mostly because of my superstitions, but also because I know what works best for me, and earlier on when writing creative pieces, I’m very secretive.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Blog #1: Please tell me this is enough to get a grade? I still don't understand the grading requirements on these!

Social constructionism is exactly what it says on the tin, the supposition that language is a social construction. What I got from this theory is that language has a social purpose and that writing, as a form of language use, while it may seem to be a solitary action to many, is really always social. This is because most forms of writing are intended for an audience, and the writer must think of his/her audience while writing, making it a social action.

Another thing that the text makes clear is that students have two achievement levels, one that they can reach alone and one that they can reach with the help of someone more experienced. This is because the knowledge is built through the interaction between these two people, be the more experienced party a peer or a teacher. This relates directly to writing centers, because the writing coach takes the role of the more experienced party and helps the student writer reach the higher achievement level. This doesn't mean that the coach gets nothing out of the interaction, because in chapter 2 we learn that when someone tutors another person, they learn more than the person they are helping, so that's an added bonus.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010